J-POWER EPDC

Business Management and Execution Structure

Corporate Governance System

Following the partial amendment of the Articles of Incorporation, which was approved at the 70th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 28, 2022, J-POWER transitioned to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee effective as of the same date. Following the transition, we have established a system of mutual oversight among Directors through the attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors of Outside Directors who participate in the Company's management decision-making from an independent position.

The Board of Directors delegates the execution of important business to Directors to enable speedy execution. At the same time, the Company is further improving the transparency and fairness of its management and strengthening its supervisory function by increasing the number of Outside Directors with voting rights on the Board of Directors and through the Audit & Supervisory Committee's right to express opinions on Director nominations and compensation. In fiscal 2019, the Company established a Nomination and Compensation Committee, more than half the members of which are Independent Officers, to enhance the independence, objectivity and accountability of the Board of Directors with regard to the nomination and compensation of Directors and top management.

Furthermore, the execution of duties by Directors is constantly monitored through their comments at meetings of the Board of Directors and other management meetings by the Audit & Supervisory Committee, which includes outside Audit & Supervisory Committee Members with abundant experience in such areas as the management of leading Japanese companies and the execution of government policies. The Company believes this system allows for sufficient corporate governance functionality.
In addition to the above, the Company has also established an Executive Committee.

   

Corporate Governance Structure and Internal Control System Chart

(as of 28 June 2022)

  
 

1. Composition of the Board of Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Committee

Composition of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is composed of Directors with abundant experience, deep insight and highly specialized knowledge to maintain balance and diversity in the knowledge, experience, and abilities of the Board of Directors as a whole. The Company appoints up to 16 internal and external Directors in total, including 12 Directors (excluding Directors those who are members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee) and four Directors who are members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee ("Audit and Supervisory Committee Members").

To ensure the effectiveness of the independent and objective management supervision by the Board of Directors, the Company endeavors to appoint at least one-third of Independent Outside Directors selected for their experience, knowledge, specialization, and other attributes.
Currently, the total number of Directors is 16, including six Independent Outside Directors.

Composition of the Audit & Supervisory Committee

The Audit & Supervisory Committee is composed of a maximum of four Audit & Supervisory Committee Members, the majority of whom are Outside Audit & Supervisory Committee Members. At least one person with appropriate knowledge of finance and accounting is appointed as an Audit & Supervisory Committee Member.*
Currently, the total number of the Audit & Supervisory Committee Members is four, including three Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Committee Members.

  1. *Audit & Supervisory Committee Member, Hiroshi Fujioka (full-time, Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Committee Member), has significant knowledge of finance and accounting through his many years of experience in public administration practices such as public finance and financial issues, etc.

Management skills Matrix

(as of June 28, 2023)

Name Position Corporate
Management,
Business
Strategy
Financial
Strategy,
Accounting
Legal, Risk
Management,
Governance
Human
Resource
Strategy
DX,
Innovation
Sales &
Marketing
Engineering,
R&D
Business &
Project
Development
Production
Engineering,
Quality
Control
International
Business,
Global
Remarks
Toshifumi Watanabe*1 Representative
Director Chairman
check check check check check
Hitoshi Kanno*1 Representative
Director President
check check check check check check
Hiroyasu Sugiyama Director check check check check check
Osamu Hagiwara Director check check check Department Director of Nuclear Power Business Dept.
Yoshikazu Shimada Director check check check check Department Director of Renewable Energy Dept.
Hiroshi Sasatsu Director check check check
Isshu Kurata Director check check check check check Department Director of Energy
Takaya Nomura Director check check check check check
Ryoji Sekine Director check check check check check Department Director of International Business Management Dept.
Tomonori Ito Director check check check
John Buchanan Director check check check
Takashi Yokomizo*1 Director check check
Naori Fukuda Audit&Supervisory
Committee Member
check check check check check
Hiroshi Fujioka*1 Audit&Supervisory
Committee Member
check check
Kiyoshi Nakanishi*1 Audit&Supervisory
Committee Member
check check check
Kimiko Oga Audit&Supervisory
Committee Member
check check check

Notes:

  1. 1: Nomination and Compensation Committee Member

2. System for the Execution of Directors' Duties

Ensuring Effectiveness in the Execution of Duties

The Board of Directors meets monthly in principle and on an as-needed basis, with attendance of all of the Directors, including the Outside Directors. The Executive Committee meets weekly in principle, with the attendance of all Senior Directors*1, Titled Executive Officers, full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Specially Appointed Audit & Supervisory Committee Member, to discuss matters to be referred to the Board of Directors and important company-wide matters and important matters pertaining to individual business execution related to business executed by the President and Executive Vice Presidents based on policies decided by the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors delegates some decisions on important business execution (excluding the matters stipulated in each item of Article 399-13, Paragraph 5 of the Companies Act) to Senior Directors in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation, and allocates functions to the Board of Directors and Executive Committee. In addition, by establishing a system in which Executive Officers, to whom authority is delegated by Senior Directors, share responsibility for business execution, the Company clarifies responsibility and authority thereby ensuring accurate and prompt decision-making and efficient corporate management.

Notes:

  1. 1: Senior Directors: Chairman, President

Ensuring Appropriateness in the Execution of Duties

The Company has established an Internal Audit Department to ensure proper business execution and conducts internal audits from a position independent from the other operating units. Each operating unit also conducts periodic self-audits of the execution of business in its unit. In addition, important internal audit results are reported to the Board of Directors, the Audit & Supervisory Committee, and the Executive Committee, etc., to ensure cooperation between the Internal Audit Department, Directors (excluding Director who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members), and the Audit & Supervisory Committee.

Preventing Conflicts of Interest

Directors take the initiative to act with integrity and fairness based on a firm spirit of legal compliance and sense of ethics in accordance with our Corporate Philosophy, Corporate Conduct Rules, and Compliance Action Guidelines. In the event that the Company engages in transactions with Directors, etc.,* the Company works to prevent conflicts of interest by requiring advance approval of the Board of Directors for such transactions and the reporting of the results of the transactions to the Board of Directors.

  1. * Directors and major shareholders (shareholders with shares representing 10% or more of the voting rights in the Company)

3. Audits by Audit & Supervisory Committee

In accordance with the Companies Act, J-POWER appoints Audit & Supervisory Committee who audit the legality and appropriateness of the execution of business by Directors. The Audit & Supervisory Committee conduct audits at J-POWER's Headquarters by hearing statements made at meetings of the Board of Directors and by interviewing the Directors (excluding Directors those who are members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee) and Executive Officers on the status of the execution of Directors' and Executive Officers' duties. In addition, the Audit & Supervisory Committee perform site visits to local operating units and subsidiaries in Japan and overseas.
During the accounting audits, Audit & Supervisory Committee liaise with the Independent Auditors to regularly receive reports and exchange opinions regarding auditing schedules and the audit results. This enables Audit & Supervisory Committee to judge the validity of the auditing method of the Independent Auditors and the results of the audits.
To auditing staff under the Audit & Supervisory Committee, the Company has established an Office of Audit & Supervisory Committee as an independent unit separated from the Directors' chain of command. The office's Specially Appointed Audit & Supervisory Committee Member and full-time specialist staff assist the Audit & Supervisory Committee in the course of their audits.

4. Group Governance

With regard to the administration of subsidiaries and affiliates, the J-POWER Group's basic policy aims at integral Group-wide development in accordance with the Group's management plan. The administration of subsidiaries and affiliates is conducted in accordance with the Company's internal regulations, and the Group Management Committee works to improve the appropriateness of operations for the entire corporate Group. In addition, the Audit & Supervisory Committee and the Internal Audit Department conduct audits of subsidiaries and affiliates to ensure proper operations within the corporate group.

5. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Board of Directors

Since fiscal year 2015, the Company has been analyzing and evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and we disclose a summary of the results of the evaluation on an annual basis.
To improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, the Company strives to enhance the quality of discussions at monthly meetings of the Board of Directors and has implemented a number of initiatives, including the following.

  • Enhancement of discussions on management strategy
  • Ensuring speedy execution
  • Use of the Nomination and Compensation Committee
  • Initiatives to contribute to substantive improvements including the provision of information outside of meetings of the Board of Directors , inspections of power plants and other facilities by outside officers, and training for internal officers

Fiscal 2021 Initiatives

The analysis and evaluation of the previous fiscal year found promoting initiatives “to further enhance the quality of Board of Directors' discussions” and “to ensure speedy execution” are effective for further improving the effectiveness of the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Company focused on the following initiatives in fiscal 2021.

Further enhance the quality of Board of Directors' discussions

  • Holding new small meetings for the exchange of opinions among outside officers, executive officers, and related divisions as an opportunity for a more frank exchange of opinions (held six times in fiscal 2021 on the topic of digital transformation and the hydrogen and wind power businesses)
  • Participation of the executive officer in charge at advance briefings for Outside Directors on board meeting agenda items
  • Continuing to provide opportunities for internal and external officers to exchange opinions and engage in informal discussions outside of board meetings

Measures to ensure speedy execution

  • Ongoing discussion on the corporate governance structure (including further review of executive authority)
  • Creation of a flexible decision-making structure through the establishment of a cross-sectional organization for hydrogen and Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS)

Evaluation Method

As for the evaluation method for fiscal 2021, interviews and questionnaires were conducted with all 18 officers, including the six outside officers, in February and March 2022, and the aggregate results were discussed at the meeting of the Board of Directors held in April 2022.
Based on the results of the evaluation, the following decisions were made at the meeting of the Board of Directors held in May 2022, after being reviewed by and receiving recommendations from an outside attorney.

Evaluation Results

The priority initiatives and ongoing efforts promoted in fiscal 2021 were evaluated as effective from the following perspectives.

  • The holding of small meetings and advance briefings by the executive officer in charge led to more active communication between internal and external officers and the promotion of understanding by external officers, which contributed to substantive discussions.
  • Continued discussions on our corporate governance structure (including discussions on the nature and composition of the Board of Directors) led to the decision to transition to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee. (From fiscal 2022, the transition to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee and the delegation of important business execution decisions from the Board of Directors to the Directors will enable the Company to ensure more speedy execution of business.)
  • The quality of discussions has been further enhanced through the exchange of opinions and informal discussions outside of meetings of the Board of Directors, the timely provision of materials for Executive Committee meetings to Outside Directors, and other previous efforts.

Based on the above, the Company evaluated that the overall effectiveness of the Board of Directors has been ensured. On the other hand, amidst the drastic changes in the business environment surrounding the Company, there were some comments, especially from outside officers, requesting action with respect to the following.

  1. Further enhancement of discussions on management strategy (including sustainability initiatives)
  2. Accurate reflection of the Board of Directors' discussions in business execution
  3. Further improvement to the operation of meetings of the Board of Directors (devising ways to enhance deliberations by the Board of Directors based on advance briefings, etc.)
  4. Steadily implement the transition to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee

Policy for Fiscal 2022

In light of the transition to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee, in fiscal 2022 the Company affirmed that it would be effective to focus on the following measures.

(1) Further enhancement of discussions on management strategy (including sustainability initiatives)

  • Further enhance the quality and quantity of discussions in response to changes in the business environment, etc.

(2) Accurate reflection of the Board of Directors' discussions in business execution

  • Further promote business execution that is not limited to conventional perspectives, appropriately taking into account the advice and suggestions of outside officers

(3) Further improvement to the operation of meetings of the Board of Directors (devising ways to enhance deliberations by the Board of Directors based on advance explanations, etc.)

  • Further enhance explanations of proposals and reports by Directors in charge in the form of Q&A sessions during advance briefings
  • Improve the quality of materials submitted for discussion (preparation of materials that more clearly clarify the issues to be discussed by the Board of Directors, etc.), etc.

(4) Steadily implement the transition to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee

  • Review executive authority, including the delegation of important business execution decisions
  • Consider reporting on Directors' execution of duties to further enhance the supervisory function, etc.

The Company will continue to strive to improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors through ongoing and further initiatives in addition to further enhancement of discussions at meetings of the Board of Directors.

6. Outside Officers

The Company's Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Committee Members are independent officers who have fulfilled both the requirements for independent officers prescribed by the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the Criteria to Determine the Independence of Outside Officers* prescribed by the Company.

7. Appointment and Dismissal of Officers

When appointing members of the management executive and nominating candidates for Director or Audit & Supervisory Committee Member, the Board of Directors appoints or nominates persons with abundant experience, deep insight and advanced specialized knowledge who are deemed appropriate for selection as a management executive, Director, or Audit & Supervisory Committee Member after deliberations undertaken based on the recommendations of the President. After deliberation by the Nomination and Compensation Committee, the President nominates management executives and Director candidates.
In the event that there have been illegal or unjust acts by management executives or Directors, or if other circumstances arise in which it is deemed that there are serious impediments to the continuation of the performance of his/her duties, the Board of Directors will decide whether to dismiss or otherwise punish such management executives or Directors after deliberation by the Nomination and Compensation Committee.

8. Remuneration of Management

The Company's basic policy on remuneration for Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members) and Executive Officers is to increase the linkage between remuneration and business performance as well as corporate value, and to provide an incentive for sustained improvement in business performance and increase in corporate value over the long term. To this end, the Company provides such officers with monthly cash-based remuneration, performance-linked remuneration, and stock-based remuneration. Remuneration for Outside Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members) and Specially Appointed Audit & Supervisory Committee Member is limited to monthly remuneration in order to ensure their independence from business execution.

The 70th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 28, 2022, approved that the total amount of cash remuneration for Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members) shall be capped at 570 million yen per year (including 60 million yen for Outside Directors), that the Company's contribution to a trust for stock-based remuneration for Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members) who are not Outside Directors shall be capped at 165 million yen over three fiscal years, and that the total number of points to be granted per year shall be capped at 40,600 points. The method of determining the amount of remuneration for Directors (excluding those who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members) is deliberation by the Nomination and Compensation Committee followed by resolution by the Board of Directors within the limit of the total amount of cash remuneration and the maximum amount of stock-based remuneration. The method of determining the amount of remuneration for Executive Officers and Specially Appointed Audit & Supervisory Committee Member is deliberation by the Nomination and Compensation Committee followed by resolution by the Board of Directors.

The amount of remuneration for Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members was resolved at the above General Meeting of Shareholders to be no more than 120 million yen per year (fixed monthly remuneration calculated based on position, etc.). Within the above amount, the amount of remuneration for each Director who is an Audit & Supervisory Committee Member is determined through discussion among Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members.

Page Top